Indian Removal And American History - 1863 Words

Indian Removal From the time the first colonies were settled in America, relations between the Native American Indians and white settlers ranged from respected friends to hated enemies. Into the 1800s, Americans who were still in competition with the Indians for land and resources considered them to be uncivilized and barbaric. But many Americans admired the Indians and valued their contributions to American history and culture. These people hoped that with time the Indians could be peaceably assimilated into American society. Cherokee removal, which part of the trail of tears was the whereby the Cherokee Nation was forcefully relocated from their lands in Alabama, Texas, Georgia, Tennessee and South Carolina to the Indian Territory. It†¦show more content†¦However, they did not have equal rights as the Mexican Americans were mostly immigrants seeking work in ranches. Farms, railroads and in the mines. During such early times agricultural work was labor intensive and most of the farms were owned by the Native Americans. In conclusion, There was development of plantation system and hence the natives created slavery to generate profits, success, status, and to cultivate their land. the federal government came up with the reservation system to provide land to the Native Americans and hence distanced them from the land that other groups wanted. They were later forced and subdued onto reservations where they were given few options but to maintain some of their culture and traditions, and to govern themselves. Civil War The civil war is considered as the central event in the consciousness of the American history. The war determined what kind of nation the country would be. It was the most destructive and the largest conflict in the Western world from the end of the Napoleonic wars and 1914 before the beginning of the first World War. The civil war could have been avoided following the course of its inception. It occurred due to the uncompromising differences that occurred between the slave and free states over the power of the national government to deter slavery in the places which had not acquired the full rights to become states. President Donald Trump stipulates that had Andrew Jackson been in power, theShow MoreRelatedThe Indian Removal Act of 18301123 Words   |  5 PagesTHE INDIAN REMOVAL ACT OF 1830 Migdalia Tuero HIST101: American History to 1877 Professor Kathleen Davis February 13, 2014 There are several historical events and issues that have impacted the contemporary political development among American history. In the history of America one of these groups are the Native Americans. The white man throughout the South called for a removal of the Indian peoples. They wanted the Native Indians to be resettled to the west because their presence createdRead MoreIndian Removal Act Of 18301155 Words   |  5 Pages2015 Indian Removal Act of 1830 The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was an act that helped aid the expansion of the United States population into the southernmost states, occupied mainly by Native Americans. The act was a long time coming, especially with President Andrew Jackson, a long-time proponent of Native American removal, at the helm. This paper explores the history leading up to the law, the introduction and passage, as well as the sometimes-tragic implementation of the Indian Removal Act ofRead MoreAmerican History: Native Americans 829 Words   |  3 PagesHave you ever wondered what it would be like to be Native American during the European invasion? In American history Native Americans were treated unfairly. The American government mistreated the Natives by lying to them and treating them as foreigners. After years of fighting for freedom the Natives did not achieve their goal for freedom. The Trail of Tears, being the most tragic event in American history, was due to the Removal Act in the 1830s, the misguidance of President Andrew Jackson, theRead MoreOn How the American Indians Were Removed from Their Land1586 Words   |  7 PagesOne by one Indian peoples were removed to the West. The Delaware, the Ottawa, Shawnee, Pawnee and Potawatomi, the Sauk and Fox, Miami and Kickapoo, the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. In all some 90 thousand Indians were relocated. The Cherokee were among the last to go. Some reluctantly agreed to move. Others were driven from their homes at bayonet point. Almost two thousands of them died along the route they remembered as the Trail of Tears. For decades, the state of Georgia soughtRead MoreFederal Indian Policy : The Indian Removal Act Of 18301584 Words   |  7 PagesFederal Indian Policy Native American’s have always been the aspect that shapes our culture and history today. The rise of the new world started with the discovery of the land of which the Native Americans resided. They are referred to as the indigenous people because they were the people who lived and survived off this land first. The Native Americans have a unique culture that consisted of a bond with nature. They had similar gender roles just like the white population. The men were hunters, warriorsRead MoreThe Indian Removal Act Of 18301299 Words   |  6 Pagesearly American history, there has been a constant battle between Native Americans and the earliest European settlers. There were many diverse, and complex views when approaching this subject matter; however, in 1830 President Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act, which forced Indians to relocate from their homelands in south east to land west of the Mississippi river. This granted the U.S. a large portion of new rich land, unf ortunately it was at the expense of the Native Americans. WhenRead MoreTrail of Tears: Forceful Removal of Indians in the US837 Words   |  3 PagesThe forceful removal and exodus of thousands of Native Americans from their lands east of the Mississippi River during the 1830s is often called the Trail of Tears. This removal of Native Americans from their lands was a result of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which was signed by then-President Andrew Jackson one year into his presidency and which President Martin Van Buren ensured was carried out. When Andrew Jackson became President of the United States in 1829, he based his decision of signingRead MoreNative American And Native Americans1137 Words   |  5 PagesNative American Displacement Long ago on the great plains, the buffalo roamed and the Native Americans lived amongst each other. They were able to move freely across the lands until the white men came and concentrated them into certain areas. Today there are more than five-hundred different tribes with different beliefs and history. Native Americans still face problems about the horrific history they went through and today s discrimination. The removal of American Indian tribes is one of theRead MoreThe Political Issues Of The Indian Removal Act Of 18301154 Words   |  5 PagesThe Political Issues of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 Former President Andrew Jackson was responsible for putting the Indian Removal Act of 1830 in place. It forcibly removed five civilized Native American tribes— Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole—from the southern United States. The act would stay in effect until the end of the Second Seminole War in 1842. Native Americans’ feelings toward the United States government have changed from one of annoyance to disgust since being takenRead MoreTrail Of Tears Essay1649 Words   |  7 PagesTrail of Tears is part of the immoral history of the United States. The information in this paper will be about the causes, history, deaths, and the hopes that were lost. There were at least four causes for the Indian removal act of 1830. The history of the trail discussion about the Native Americans, and what happens to them when they were moving to their new home in the west, as well what happened after the removal act. The main causes of why the Native Americans had to be removed will be expanded

Heroics of Women in Ibsens A Dolls House Essay - 1858 Words

Heroics of Women in Ibsens A Dolls House The Heroics of Women Henrik Ibsen’s â€Å"A Doll’s House† is a play about a young wife and her husband. Nora and Helmer seem to be madly in love with one another and very happy with their lives together. Yet the conflict comes into this show when Nora brags to her friend Ms. Linde about how she had forged her father’s name to borrow money to save her husband’s life and how she had been secretly paying off this debt. Helmer finds out about this crime and is furious, until he finds that no one will ever know about it. This entire conflict is written to bring to light the ridiculous social expectations demanded of both women and men. Ibsen expertly leads the audience into accepting that these†¦show more content†¦He gives her extra money for Christmastime expenditures and also seeks to give her some luxurious. â€Å"Tell me just what – within reason – you’d most like to have. (Ibsen 1570)† Helmer is a certainly a man that lives up to what is expected of him, inside and outside the home. Nora, as a woman, also has many expectations she must try to live up to. By natural design, women are not good with money, with planning, or with complicated thinking. They are certainly the underclass of the sexes. This condition was caused by the fact that women were forced to mold themselves into a model themselves that men deem desirable and best. The wants and desires of women were put aside so that they may better perform the role of pleasing the men in their lives. They were there to support their husbands and help carry on the tasks of keeping the house in order, or they’re to care for their fathers and clean his house of generally care for him. This entire social condition became an inescapable cycle, since men chose what men should and would be like and they chose as suits them. A woman did not have the opportunity to go out and â€Å"find herself† or to further her own talents and abilities. They were instead molded into a shape that would further enhance t he men’s talents and abilities. Yet even though the weakest characteristics were attributed to women, great responsibility was put on them as regarding the raising of their children. It was commonly assumed thatShow MoreRelatedWomen s Rights By Henrik Ibsen1481 Words   |  6 PagesHenrik Ibsen playwright supports the awareness of women s rights by creating female characters that represent the struggle for freedom from their restricted roles. After years of playing the role of a superficial doll, Nora converts into an assertive and determined woman. The true cause of Nora s transformation starts with a revolution within her. Ibsen dramatizes Nora s discovery of identity by means of various literary techniques. By the finale of the play, Nora has survived a deconstructionRead MoreThe hero we all wish we could be1600 Words   |  7 Pagestheir household, children, and ultimately to satisfy their husbands desires. In the play A Doll House by Henrik Ibsen we see the character o f Nora Helmer escape from this age’s common gender role by leaving her husband and children behind in search for her own happiness. While many could criticize Nora’s abandonment of her children and husband a cowardly and wrong thing to do. Nora could also be seen as heroic for challenging the power of a man during this time and escaping her unhappy life. We seeRead More Tragic Heroes in Arthur Millers Death of a Salesman and Henrik Ibsens A Dolls House1709 Words   |  7 PagesMillers Death of a Salesman and Henrik Ibsens A Dolls House Dramatists such as Aristotle started to write a series of plays called tragedies. They were as follows: the play revolved around a great man such as a king or war hero, who possessed a tragic flaw. This flaw or discrepancy would eventually become his downfall. These types of plays are still written today, for example, Arthur Millers Death of Salesman and Henrik Ibsens A Dolls House. Death of Salesman shows the downfall of the modernRead MoreThe Heroic Stand Of Crossing Into Womanhood1898 Words   |  8 PagesJuly 26, 2016 Research Essay A Bold Act of Love: The Heroic Stand of Crossing into Womanhood In Henrik Ibsen’s play A Doll House he uses an individual female, Nora Helmer, as being the most predominant character who has been controlled most of her life by her father and husband. Nora’s husband, Torvald Helmer, is seen to be an overprotected husband that leads Nora to believe she is a precious little doll in obeying his commands. During the play Ibsen uses another character, Nils Krogstad, who soon beginsRead More New Years Changes in Henrik Isbens A Dolls House Essay1421 Words   |  6 PagesIn Victorian England, women were expected to be undoubtedly obedient to their fathers, and later in life, servile to their husbands as well. They were normally forbidden to pursue a real education, and would often â€Å"devote themselves to their husbands happiness† (Roland 10). Throughout history, women have had to make sacrifices for other peoples feelings and lives. They have given up their own lives, freedoms, education, and careers due to their concern for o thers. A concurrent injustice occursRead MoreThe Greek Heroic Age And Late 19th Century Europe858 Words   |  4 Pages The role of women in the Greek Heroic Age and late 19th century Europe was one of great obedience and devotion to the men of the house. Nora in A Doll House, a play written by Henrik Ibsen, and Penelope in The Odyssey, an epic poem sung by Homer, both display unwavering loyalty to the men they love. Penelope pretends she is available to the suitors by weaving and unravelling a burial shroud to buy time and by offering her hand in marriage to the winner of her archery contest. Nora pretends she isRead MoreNora Helmer s A Doll s House2548 Words   |  11 Pagesdignity just to play the role in his life. When the door slams at the end of â€Å"A Doll’s House† by Henry Ibsen, No one would not believe the woman walking out of her house is the same one who appeared at the beginning of the play. The main character in this play is Nora. Nora goes through a complete transformation, changing from a child like and dependant woman to a self strong woman pushing to become independent. Ibsen portrays the roles of society in the Victorian times in this play. Throughout her wholeRead MoreGender Roles Of A Doll House By Henrik Ibsen1706 Words   |  7 Pageswere always heroic or deviant, with no in between. The portrayal of men and women in dramatic works was one-dimensional with little acknowledgement of the characteristics which make them human. Henrik Ibsen shifted expectations with his focus on the repression of women in A Doll House. His exploration of the repression of women in a man-controlled world became a controversial topic among conservative Scandinavians in 1879 (Jacobus 377). With his complex and diverse characters, Ibsen was eager toRead More Comparison Between the Characters of Antigone and A Doll’s House1456 Words   |  6 PagesCharacters of Antigone and A Doll’s House   Ã‚  Ã‚   There have always been fundamental differences between the mentalities of the male and female sexes. At one time, women were considered as a possession of the father or husband. Women were denied participation in public life, they had restricted access to education, and they werent legally allowed to own property. This oppression of women did not prevent them from fighting for, and obtaining, equal rights.   It seems that women followed the laws created byRead MoreHenrik Ibsen s A Doll s House1762 Words   |  8 PagesHenry Ibsen s play, A Doll’s house, revolves around characters whose love in marriages differs from the average relationship. The two main characters, Nora and Torvald, have issues of love which Ibsen portrays as deceptive in the eyes of readers. The story involves a selfish action Nora takes to help save ill Torvalds life, which later under a serious agreement she falls into trouble with risking the marriage. Readers learn that she loved Torvald and would exceed limits to save him. From Further

Erikson and Child DevelopmentManagement

Question: ExplainErikson and Child Development:Management? Answer: Introduction: Erikson mainly believed that childhood is a very important stage for the development of an individuals personality. Therefore he developed a theory about the stage of development of the human being from the start of birth to death and included theories which dealt with factors like ego, superego, id and theory of infant sexuality and he also believed strongly that personality usually develops after the age of five in a child. Erikson also focused on how the people developed the sense of identity, abilities and beliefs regarding themselves that resulted in the production and satisfaction of the members of the society (Slater, Charles L. (2003). His theory has a combination of the development of the individuals beliefs mentally and psychologically so as to learn how to exist in a larger community. Erikson developed many stages and each stage is associated with a general life span or a particular time of life. However each of Ericksons theory explains the different types of motivation f or the children to adapt to the stages and further be productive and well equipped within the society and also explains the types of issues and developmental activities which results in the motivation that occurs less frequently. The first stage is that of mistrust and trust which takes place from birth to about one year of age. In this period the children are provided with all their basic needs such as diapers, warmth, love, affection and food as they will learn to trust other people in their surrounding who care for them and they would in turn believe that the world is nice to them. If the infants are ignored and not given attention or even if they are taken care of unpredictably or in a rough manner they will learn to question their caretakers and assume that the others will not always be ready to support them when required. Therefore to trust others is the first learning and also how to have a good support and loving relationships with the others and these results help in the development of a positive self-image (Bee, Helen et al (2009). The second stage of the theory is autonomy versus doubt and shame which takes place in the time span of one to three years of age. Here the children are autonomous and th ey feel a sense of confidence that they can start deciding for themselves and also make their own choices so that they attain positive results. These young children become more independent when the caretakers give them support and make the child feel confident to make their own decisions and also to explore with themselves and solve their problems without feeling ashamed. Because when a child feels shameful or guilty they are incapable of making the right decisions and doing the daily tasks in a confident manner. This would result in stopping the development of a positive way of looking at oneself because these children start to see themselves as very stupid and feel low about them. Finally the third stage is the initiative versus guilt which takes place at the age of three to six years. Here the children start to develop the capability and continue to develop their desire to try out all the new things and also to learn to be responsible for their doings to some extent. When the car etakers give the children a chance to explore and learn the children will continue to look for their purpose but if the caretakers try to restrict the children and force a lot of responsibility on them the kids may start to feel guilty because they are not able to complete their tasks perfectly (Allen et al (2003). Conclusion: In conclusion it can be said that Eriksons theories emphasize the importance of the various stages in child development and also claims that human beings continue to develop and change throughout their span of life and their personality is not only formed during the years of childhood. This also helps in giving a positive idea and makes them feel realistic as it greatly encourages oneself and the others to see the future in a more positive way to change and develop in a better manner rather than to look back with regret and blame (Crain, William (2011). References Allen, Eileen; Marotz, Lynn (2003).Developmental Profiles Pre-Birth Through Twelve(4th ed.). Albany, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning. Bee, Helen; Boyd, Denise (March 2009).The Developing Child(12th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. Crain, William (2011).Theories of Development: Concepts and Applications(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Slater, Charles L. (2003), "Generativity versus stagnation: An elaboration of erikson's adult stage of human development",Journal of Adult Development

The most responsible for the death of Eva Smith Essay Example

The most responsible for the death of Eva Smith? Paper I think that not only the conscience of the family, but sin is a part of the Inspector. The pun on the name Goole could be a sign to hint the evil. Throughout the play, signs of iniquity and the devil come up, for example, the Seven Deadly Sins. At least each member of the family had been corrupted by any one or more if these sins. Therefore, the one making the most errors is the most responsible for the death of Eva Smith. Foremost, Mr Birling is full of pride. He was trying to prevent the spiteful Inspector bad-mouthing his family. We will write a custom essay sample on The most responsible for the death of Eva Smith? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The most responsible for the death of Eva Smith? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The most responsible for the death of Eva Smith? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer He also believed that his position in the community would be tarnished and his awaiting knighthood be refused. He wanted to protect his family from the reality of the media. Arthur was also quite slothful as he could not be bothered to fight the rebellion fronted by Eva Smith. He took the easiest route to solve the problem: discharging Eva. His anger and impatience was shown when he replied to the harsh tone of the inspector by saying Look theres nothing mysterious about this business! Mr Birling is very rude and adamant about the fact that he is always right. This is clearly revealed in his speech in Act One where he says that the Titanic is absolutely unsinkable, this accusation failed when the Titanic sank on its maiden voyage, and that the prospect of war is nearly impossible because 1914 saw the start of World War Two. He also tries to show his malevolence and disgust towards the socialists Bernard Shaws and H. G. Wells. This perhaps depicts the stereotypical Edwardian arrogance. However, he only wants to shield his family from whats really out there. Mrs Sybil Birling is very like her husband, except that she is his social superior. She conveys pride by dismissing Eva just because she used the name Mrs Birling as alibi to her real name. Sybil is also short-fused because she judges Eva without letting her have a fair trial. Surrounding the trail, Sybil Birling was too lazy to listen to the trial and what Eva had to say to make amends for her previous mistakes. She is also stubborn and unwilling to accept the truth until she finally breaks down at the being of Act Three. Mrs Birling is also used being pampered and harboured from the facts in life. Sheila Birling portrays immense envy when she knows that Eva has every that she hasnt to make that dress suit her. This is also an example of covetousness. Pride fuelled her anger and therefore made her make a portentous threat to the manager of Milwards (Ill get mother to close her account if she doesnt go). Though Sheila tries hard to redeem herself by feeling upset, guilty and understanding the extent of her problem, she is run by pure jealousy when she tried to get rid of Eva Smith. Eric Birling has been possessed by one too many of the sins, primarily gluttony. He is a heavy drinker and picks up the girls of the town at the Palace Bar. He is also very lustful because hes not in love with Eva, but just wants to make love with Eva. By bottling up his feelings and not talking to his father about his problems, Eric implies that he is hot-tempered and angry. Eric resorts to stealing, as he feels pressured to go into the family business and cant spend quality time with his family. Though Mr Birling suggests that Eric has been spoilt, Eric knows that his father is being hypocritical as it is Arthur himself who has spoilt his own son. When he is forced to face the truth by a quick-witted Sheila, he denies everything and tries to pass the blame onto someone else. His comprehension of the situation and subdued aftermath to the evening suggests that his actions have been affected by his heavy drinking throughout the nights festivities. Even though Eric says he wants to help, every decision he makes has resulted in a bitter consequence of his own perpetual representations. Finally, Gerald Croft is the only one who has been able to make Eva Smith/Daisy Renton happy amidst the destruction. Nevertheless, he was also driven by lust because he lingers on his thoughts of her and yet he didnt feel about her as she felt about him. Gerald is also trying very hard to impress his father-in-law by supporting Arthur and allowing him to drop names (This is Mr Gerald Croft the son of Sir George Croft you know, Crofts Limited. ) Originally I felt that Mr and Mrs Birling were the most responsible for the death of Eva smith because Arthur triggered the chain events, which were to be concluded by Sybil. However, after deliberating over who depicted the most sin, I feel that Eric Birling is the most responsible for the death Eva Smith because everything he did was driven by sin and to solve his problems, he dug himself into a deeper hole by allowing the sins to use his body as a vessel to carry out the bad deeds. I also believe that he spends most of his time in a constant state of drunkenness and therefore what he says may not be what he feels or intends to say. After Eric, I think Sheila is the most responsible for the death of Eva Smith because she over exaggerates her guilt and all her actions were invigorated by anger or jealousy. Next come Mr and Mrs Birling because they both had reasons apart form sin, to discharge Eva. They wanted to guard the family name and status. Lastly, I think that Gerald Croft is the most responsible for the death of Eva Smith, as he tried to make her believe in herself by giving her a job and a home. Therefore, Eric is more guilty that any other Birling family member or Gerald Croft. Overall, it appears to me that Inspector Goole is the devil and the Birlings are his minions. They take place in this world as mortals, to show what the world is becoming. I think that J. B. Priestley has a socialist view on life and he has tried to communicate that message to the public through his play: An Inspector Calls.